<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>racialization on Γραφεμας</title>
    <link>https://grafemas.net/categories/racialization/</link>
    <description>Recent content in racialization on Γραφεμας</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://grafemas.net/categories/racialization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Two Readings of the Tragic Barbarian: Hall and Saïd</title>
      <link>https://grafemas.net/blog/race/said-hall/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://grafemas.net/blog/race/said-hall/</guid>
      <description>Edith Hall&amp;rsquo;s Inventing the Barbarian (1989) and Suzanne Saïd&amp;rsquo;s chapter &amp;ldquo;Greeks and Barbarians in Euripides&#39; Tragedies: The End of Differences?&amp;rdquo; (1984) share the same object of study: the representation of non-Greek peoples in fifth-century Athenian tragedy. However, they significantly differ in their conclusions. Reading them together is a clarifying exercise in how racializing discourse operates in ancient texts. They disagreement is not about the evidence but about the modality of the discourse that the authors perceived.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
